Same name structure with different definition in C -


is allowed use same name structure different definitions in 2 different c files in same project. eg.

file1.c

typedef struct {     unsigned int unvar;               } abc;

file2.c

typedef struct {     int var; } abc;

abc used in both files. when compile these file part of same project there no errors, want understand whether correct usage.

6.7.2.1 structure , union specifiers

  1. the presence of struct-declaration-list in struct-or-union-specifier declares new type, within translation unit.

types defined within translation unit, .c file in case.

there no problem defining 2 types same name in 2 different translation units.

however 2 types not compatible unless follow rules described in 6.2.7., p1. types defined not compatible.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

php - Wordpress website dashboard page or post editor content is not showing but front end data is showing properly -

Image
recently have uploaded wordpress site onto server. have uploaded wordpress site in sub-folder under root folder ../root(domain root folder)/wordpress (where host wordpress folder). now problem content data in page or post in dashboard of wordpress admin panel not showing - see image. but data showing in front view - see image. if not browser cache issue , not issue happened tinymce editor during upgrade; try add config file: define('concatenate_scripts', false);
Read more

sql - Simple C# web application with a database -

i have been @ 3 weeks , have read , watched many videos in youtube, followed t none worked me. @ point i'm pulling hairs out. website come's out alright in web browser when textboxes filled , submit button hit database stay's empty. so have: =========================== original =========================== database column fields: firstname middlename lastname email phone bttr bdtr issues page first name:<asp:textbox id="first_name" runat="server" placeholder="your first name!" /> middle name:<asp:textbox id="middle_name" runat="server" placeholder="optional" /> last name:<asp:textbox id="last_name" runat="server" placeholder="last name" /> email address:<asp:textbox id="email" runat="server" placeholder="yourname@domain.com" /> phone:<asp:textbox id="phone" runat="server" placeholder=...
Read more

c# - Abstract method in public abstract class implementing an internal interface doesn't compile? -

internal interface i_foo { void bar(); } public abstract class a_foo : i_foo { public a_foo() { } abstract void i_foo.bar(); } public class foo : a_foo { public foo() : base() { } internal override void bar() { } } hello! i'm trying have methods visible outside code, , other visible assembly. purpose, made internal interface i_foo serve contract other parts of assembly, public abstract a_foo serve abstraction external code, , centralize constructor functionality, , several different classes foo implement a_foo , i_foo explicitly retain internal modifier. however, in a_foo class, get 'a_foo.i_foo.bar()' must declare body because not marked abstract, extern, or partial even though method marked "abstract". if add body, "abstract not valid modifier". i need method explicitly declared, in order internal in public class, , need abstract can override in actual implementation foo. why doesn't compiler let m...
Read more